Average Calorie Intake by Profession: Office Workers vs Physical Laborers vs Athletes

A software engineer sitting at a desk for nine hours burns a fundamentally different amount of energy than a construction worker hauling materials in the sun. A professional marathon runner during peak training may require three times the calories of either. Yet most calorie calculators treat "activity level" as a simple dropdown with three or four options, ignoring the enormous variation that exists across real-world occupations.

Your profession is not just what you do for a living. It is the single largest determinant of how many calories you burn outside of sleep. For the roughly 8–12 hours you spend working each day, your occupation dictates whether your body is in low-power mode or running at full metabolic capacity. That difference can amount to thousands of calories per day and fundamentally shapes what and how much you should eat.

This article provides comprehensive, data-backed calorie intake estimates for more than 30 professions spanning five activity tiers. Every number is grounded in established metabolic research, including Physical Activity Level (PAL) values published by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). Whether you work behind a screen or behind a jackhammer, understanding your occupation-specific energy demands is the first step toward dialing in your nutrition.

Understanding TDEE, PAL, and the Mifflin-St Jeor Equation

Before examining the profession-specific data, it is important to understand three key concepts that underpin every number in this article.

Total Daily Energy Expenditure (TDEE)

TDEE represents the total number of calories your body burns in a 24-hour period. It is composed of four main components:

• Basal Metabolic Rate (BMR): The energy your body uses at complete rest to maintain vital functions like breathing, circulation, and cell repair. This accounts for 60–70% of TDEE in sedentary individuals.
• Thermic Effect of Food (TEF): The energy required to digest, absorb, and metabolize nutrients. This typically represents 8–15% of total intake, varying by macronutrient composition.
• Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (NEAT): All the calories burned through daily movement that is not deliberate exercise, including walking, fidgeting, typing, standing, and occupational activity. Your job is the single largest determinant of NEAT.
• Exercise Activity Thermogenesis (EAT): Calories burned during intentional exercise sessions.

Your occupation primarily affects the NEAT component, which is why profession matters so much for total calorie needs. In sedentary workers, NEAT may contribute only 200–300 kcal/day. In heavy laborers, it can exceed 2,000 kcal/day.

Physical Activity Level (PAL)

PAL is a dimensionless ratio defined as total daily energy expenditure divided by basal metabolic rate. The WHO and FAO use PAL values to classify activity intensity across populations. A PAL of 1.2 represents a completely sedentary individual, while values above 2.0 are associated with heavy manual labor or intense athletic training. The FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation on Human Energy Requirements (2004) established reference PAL ranges that remain the global standard for estimating energy needs by activity level.

The PAL classification system breaks down as follows:

• 1.2–1.39: Sedentary or light activity lifestyle
• 1.4–1.59: Active or moderately active lifestyle
• 1.6–1.89: Vigorous or vigorously active lifestyle
• 1.9–2.5: Extremely active lifestyle

The Mifflin-St Jeor Equation

Published by Mifflin et al. (1990) in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, this equation is considered the most accurate predictive formula for estimating BMR in healthy adults. A validation study by Frankenfield et al. (2005) in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association confirmed its superiority over the Harris-Benedict equation and other alternatives.

• Male BMR = (10 x weight in kg) + (6.25 x height in cm) - (5 x age in years) + 5
• Female BMR = (10 x weight in kg) + (6.25 x height in cm) - (5 x age in years) - 161

TDEE is then calculated by multiplying BMR by the appropriate PAL value. The ranges in the tables below assume a reference male (80 kg, 178 cm, age 30) and a reference female (65 kg, 165 cm, age 30), then apply the PAL values associated with each occupation. Your individual numbers will differ based on your own body composition and demographics.

Tier 1: Sedentary Professions

These roles involve prolonged sitting with minimal physical movement during the workday. Research published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine (Dunstan et al., 2012) found that sedentary workers who sit for more than eight hours per day have significantly elevated metabolic risk independent of exercise habits.

Profession	Est. Daily Steps	PAL	TDEE Range (Male)	TDEE Range (Female)	Recommended Protein (g)
Software Developer	2,000–3,500	1.2–1.3	2,050–2,220	1,600–1,740	80–110
Accountant	2,000–3,000	1.2–1.3	2,050–2,220	1,600–1,740	80–110
Call Center Agent	1,500–2,500	1.2	2,050–2,100	1,600–1,650	75–100
Writer / Journalist	2,500–4,000	1.2–1.35	2,050–2,300	1,600–1,810	80–110
Graphic Designer	2,000–3,500	1.2–1.3	2,050–2,220	1,600–1,740	80–110

Key insight: The average office worker burns roughly 300–500 fewer calories per day than someone in the same demographic profile who holds a lightly active job. Over a year, that deficit or surplus amounts to approximately 15–23 kg of potential fat mass difference if food intake remains constant.

It is also worth noting that sedentary workers often overestimate how active they are. A study by Clemes et al. (2014), published in BMC Public Health, found that desk-based employees overestimated their daily step count by an average of 51% when asked to guess without a pedometer. This perception gap makes accurate tracking critical for this population. Many sedentary workers assume they are "lightly active" when their actual PAL falls firmly in the sedentary range.

The nutritional strategy for sedentary workers should emphasize caloric precision over volume. Because the margin between maintenance and surplus is narrow (often just 200–300 kcal), even small daily miscalculations in portion size can lead to gradual weight gain over months. High-satiety foods with strong protein-to-calorie ratios become especially important when your daily calorie budget is relatively limited.

Tier 2: Light Activity Professions

These occupations involve standing, walking, and intermittent light physical tasks. A pedometer-based study by Tudor-Locke et al. (2011), published in the International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, found that occupations requiring standing and light walking typically produce 5,000–8,000 steps per day during work hours alone.

Profession	Est. Daily Steps	PAL	TDEE Range (Male)	TDEE Range (Female)	Recommended Protein (g)
Teacher	5,000–8,000	1.4–1.55	2,390–2,650	1,870–2,070	90–120
Retail Worker	6,000–10,000	1.5–1.6	2,560–2,730	2,010–2,140	95–120
Nurse	7,000–12,000	1.5–1.7	2,560–2,900	2,010–2,270	100–130
Chef / Line Cook	5,000–9,000	1.5–1.6	2,560–2,730	2,010–2,140	95–120
Barber / Hairstylist	4,000–7,000	1.4–1.5	2,390–2,560	1,870–2,010	85–115

Nurses deserve special attention in this tier. A 2015 study in the Journal of Nursing Administration tracked step counts of hospital nurses across 12-hour shifts and found averages of 9,700 steps per shift, with some nurses exceeding 15,000 steps on busy days. Night-shift nurses face additional metabolic challenges, as circadian disruption can reduce metabolic rate by 3–5% according to research by McHill et al. (2014) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Chefs and line cooks present an interesting nutritional paradox. Despite being surrounded by food for their entire shift, many professional kitchen workers skip meals during service hours due to time pressure, then consume large quantities after their shift ends. This pattern of prolonged fasting followed by caloric loading has been associated with increased fat storage and impaired metabolic flexibility, according to research on meal timing by Jakubowicz et al. (2013) in Obesity.

Tier 3: Moderate Activity Professions

These jobs require sustained physical effort including walking, lifting, climbing, and operating equipment. The PAL range of 1.6–1.85 reflects consistent moderate exertion throughout the workday.

Profession	Est. Daily Steps	PAL	TDEE Range (Male)	TDEE Range (Female)	Recommended Protein (g)
Mail Carrier	12,000–20,000	1.6–1.8	2,730–3,070	2,140–2,410	100–130
Warehouse Worker	10,000–16,000	1.65–1.8	2,820–3,070	2,210–2,410	110–140
Plumber	8,000–13,000	1.6–1.75	2,730–2,990	2,140–2,340	105–135
Electrician	7,000–12,000	1.55–1.7	2,650–2,900	2,070–2,270	100–130
Farmer (Mixed Operations)	10,000–18,000	1.7–1.9	2,900–3,250	2,270–2,540	115–145

Agricultural workers show particularly wide TDEE variation depending on season. Research by Dufour et al. (2012), published in the American Journal of Human Biology, measured energy expenditure of farming populations using doubly labeled water and found that harvest-season TDEE could exceed non-harvest periods by 800–1,200 calories per day. This seasonal fluctuation is something generic calorie calculators miss entirely.

Mail carriers represent one of the most consistent moderate-activity professions. Unlike jobs where intensity varies throughout the day, postal delivery involves sustained walking or cycling at a steady pace for multiple hours. The U.S. Postal Service reports that rural carriers walk an average of 8–12 miles per day, placing them in a metabolic category that is remarkably predictable compared to other occupations in this tier.

Warehouse workers face a unique combination of sustained walking and intermittent heavy lifting. The rise of e-commerce has significantly increased the physical demands of warehouse roles, with some distribution center employees now walking 15+ miles per shift. Workers in refrigerated warehouses face the additional metabolic cost of thermoregulation, which can add 100–200 kcal to their daily expenditure.

Tier 4: Heavy Labor Professions

Heavy labor occupations demand intense, sustained physical effort. PAL values in this tier range from 1.9 to 2.4, placing workers in energy expenditure territory comparable to endurance athletes. The WHO Technical Report Series No. 724 (1985) on Energy and Protein Requirements specifically identified heavy manual labor as requiring dietary intakes well above 3,000 kcal/day for males.

Profession	Est. Daily Steps	PAL	TDEE Range (Male)	TDEE Range (Female)	Recommended Protein (g)
Construction Worker	12,000–20,000	1.9–2.2	3,250–3,760	2,540–2,940	120–160
Lumberjack	10,000–16,000	2.0–2.4	3,420–4,100	2,680–3,210	130–170
Miner (Underground)	8,000–14,000	2.0–2.3	3,420–3,930	2,680–3,080	130–165
Firefighter (Active Duty)	8,000–25,000	1.8–2.5	3,070–4,270	2,410–3,340	125–175
Military (Infantry)	15,000–30,000	2.0–2.5	3,420–4,270	2,680–3,340	140–180

Firefighters show the widest PAL range of any profession in this dataset because their work alternates between station standby (relatively sedentary) and active emergency response (extreme exertion). A landmark study by Ruby et al. (2002), published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, measured wildland firefighter energy expenditure using doubly labeled water and found mean daily energy expenditure of 4,420 kcal during active fire suppression. Some participants exceeded 6,000 kcal/day during peak deployment.

Military infantry data draws heavily from research conducted by the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM), which has documented energy expenditures of 4,000–6,000+ kcal/day during sustained field operations (Tharion et al., 2005, published in Military Medicine). A critical finding from military nutrition research is that soldiers frequently fail to consume enough calories during high-intensity operations, creating energy deficits of 1,000–2,000 kcal/day that impair cognitive performance, immune function, and physical output.

Workers in this tier face a practical challenge that sedentary workers do not: consuming enough food. Eating 3,500–4,000+ calories per day from whole foods requires deliberate meal planning and frequent eating throughout the day. Many heavy laborers report difficulty meeting calorie targets simply because they do not have time or appetite for large meals during physically demanding work hours.

Tier 5: Professional Athletes by Sport

Professional athletes represent the upper extreme of human energy expenditure. The ACSM Position Stand on Nutrition and Athletic Performance (Thomas et al., 2016, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise) provides the framework for these estimates. Note that athlete calorie needs fluctuate dramatically between training phases, competition periods, and off-seasons.

Sport / Discipline	Est. Daily Steps Equivalent	PAL	TDEE Range (Male)	TDEE Range (Female)	Recommended Protein (g)
Marathon Runner	25,000–45,000	2.2–2.8	3,760–4,780	2,940–3,740	120–150
Competitive Swimmer	8,000–12,000 (+ pool)	2.0–2.6	3,420–4,440	2,680–3,480	130–170
Professional Cyclist (Tour)	10,000–15,000 (+ bike)	2.5–3.5	4,270–5,980	3,340–4,680	130–160
Football (NFL Lineman)	8,000–14,000	2.0–2.5	4,500–6,500	N/A	180–250
Basketball (NBA)	12,000–20,000	2.0–2.4	3,600–4,800	2,900–3,700	140–180
Weightlifter / Powerlifter	4,000–8,000	1.6–2.0	3,200–4,500	2,400–3,200	160–220
CrossFit Competitor	8,000–15,000	2.0–2.5	3,420–4,270	2,680–3,340	150–200
Tennis (Professional)	10,000–18,000	1.8–2.3	3,070–3,930	2,410–3,080	120–160
Ice Hockey	8,000–14,000	1.9–2.4	3,250–4,100	2,540–3,210	140–180
Soccer (Professional)	15,000–28,000	2.0–2.5	3,420–4,270	2,680–3,340	130–170

Professional cyclists during Grand Tour events represent the highest sustained energy expenditure documented in human physiology. Saris et al. (1989), in a study published in the International Journal of Sports Medicine, used doubly labeled water to measure Tour de France riders and recorded average daily energy expenditures of 5,900 kcal, with mountain stage values exceeding 8,000 kcal. NFL linemen present a different extreme: their combination of high body mass (130–160 kg) and intense training produces TDEE values that can surpass 6,500 kcal/day, as documented by Cole et al. (2005) in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

Swimmers deserve a specific callout because water-based exercise adds a thermoregulatory component that land-based sports lack. Maintaining core body temperature in pool water (typically 25–28 degrees Celsius) increases metabolic rate beyond what the mechanical work alone demands. This is one reason why swimmers often report higher appetite than runners at comparable training volumes.

It is also important to note the dramatic difference between in-season and off-season calorie needs for team sport athletes. A professional soccer player consuming 4,000 kcal/day during competitive season may need only 2,800–3,000 kcal during off-season recovery periods. Failing to adjust intake during these transitions is a common cause of body composition changes between seasons.

Hidden Calorie Burns: What Your Job Title Does Not Tell You

Raw TDEE estimates based on job title miss significant energy expenditure factors that vary within the same profession. Understanding these hidden calorie burns is critical for accurate nutrition planning.

Thermoregulation

Workers in extreme temperatures burn additional calories. Research by Castellani and Young (2016), published in Comprehensive Physiology, showed that cold-exposed workers can burn 100–400 additional calories per day through shivering and non-shivering thermogenesis. This affects outdoor construction workers in winter, cold-storage warehouse employees, and commercial fishers. Heat exposure also increases energy expenditure through sweating and cardiovascular effort, though the effect is smaller (50–150 kcal/day) according to the same research.

Mental Load and Stress

Cognitive work is not metabolically free. While the brain uses approximately 20% of resting metabolic energy, periods of intense concentration can modestly increase glucose utilization. More significantly, job-related psychological stress elevates cortisol, which alters fat storage patterns and can increase appetite-driven overconsumption by 200–500 kcal/day according to research by Epel et al. (2001) in Psychoneuroendocrinology. This means that two office workers with identical physical activity may have very different effective calorie needs depending on their stress levels.

Commute and Non-Work Activity

A London-based study by Flint et al. (2014), published in the British Medical Journal, found that individuals who actively commuted (walking or cycling) had significantly lower BMI and body fat percentage than car commuters. A 30-minute cycling commute each way adds roughly 300–500 kcal to daily expenditure, a factor that has nothing to do with the job itself but dramatically changes total calorie needs. For a sedentary office worker, an active commute can effectively shift their total daily expenditure from the sedentary tier into the lightly active tier.

Irregular Schedules and Shift Work

Shift workers face metabolic penalties beyond simple activity differences. A meta-analysis by Sun et al. (2018), published in Obesity Reviews, found that rotating shift workers had a 29% increased risk of metabolic syndrome. The disruption to circadian rhythm reduces resting metabolic rate and impairs glucose metabolism, meaning that two workers doing identical physical tasks may have different effective calorie needs based purely on their shift schedule.

Protective Equipment and Load Carriage

Workers who wear heavy protective equipment burn substantially more calories. Firefighters in full turnout gear (approximately 25 kg) experience a 15–20% increase in metabolic cost for the same physical task compared to performing it unencumbered, as measured by Dreger et al. (2006) in Ergonomics. Similarly, military personnel carrying combat loads of 30–45 kg see massive increases in locomotion energy costs. Even healthcare workers wearing full personal protective equipment, as became common during the COVID-19 pandemic, experience measurably higher energy expenditure than unencumbered colleagues.

Standing Desks and Workplace Modifications

The growing adoption of standing desks among office workers adds a modest but meaningful energy expenditure increase. Research published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology by Saeidifard et al. (2018) found that standing burns approximately 0.15 kcal/min more than sitting. Over a six-hour workday, that translates to roughly 54 additional calories. While not transformative on its own, combining a standing desk with short walking breaks every hour can shift a sedentary worker's PAL from 1.2 toward 1.3 or higher.

How Nutrola Handles Profession-Based Calorie Variation

Static calorie calculators assign you a single number and call it a day. The problem is that real life is not static. A nurse who works three 12-hour shifts one week and two the next has dramatically different calorie needs on working versus non-working days. A farmer during planting season has different needs than during winter months. A firefighter may alternate between days of minimal activity and days of extreme physical output.

Nutrola's adaptive TDEE calculation solves this by learning from your actual intake and weight trends over time, rather than relying on a fixed activity multiplier. When you log meals using photo recognition, voice logging, or barcode scanning, Nutrola builds a dynamic picture of your energy balance. Over two to three weeks of consistent tracking, the algorithm converges on your true TDEE, accounting for all the hidden variables that no occupation-based table can capture.

This approach is especially valuable for people whose activity levels fluctuate. If you are a firefighter with unpredictable call volumes, a seasonal agricultural worker, or someone who supplements a desk job with intense evening workouts, adaptive tracking gives you a far more accurate calorie target than any static estimate.

Protein Requirements Across Activity Levels

The protein recommendations in the tables above deserve additional context. The International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) Position Stand (Jager et al., 2017, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition) provides the following evidence-based ranges:

• Sedentary individuals: 0.8–1.0 g/kg body weight (the RDA minimum)
• Recreationally active adults: 1.0–1.4 g/kg
• Endurance athletes: 1.2–1.8 g/kg
• Strength and power athletes: 1.6–2.2 g/kg
• Heavy manual laborers: 1.4–2.0 g/kg (often overlooked in guidelines)

Heavy laborers are frequently underserved by standard protein recommendations. Their musculoskeletal demands mirror those of strength athletes, yet few nutrition resources address this population specifically. A construction worker lifting and carrying materials for eight hours needs protein for muscle repair just as much as a gym-goer performing a 90-minute lifting session. The repetitive loading patterns in manual labor create ongoing muscle microdamage that requires adequate protein for recovery and injury prevention.

For athletes, protein timing also becomes relevant. The ISSN recommends distributing protein intake across 4–6 meals per day with 20–40 g per meal for optimal muscle protein synthesis. This is equally applicable to heavy laborers, though practical constraints of job sites and schedules often make it more difficult to implement.

Bridging the Gap: From Population Averages to Your Personal Needs

Every number in this article is a population average, and population averages are a starting point, not a destination. Two office workers of the same age, sex, height, and weight can have TDEE differences of 300–500 kcal/day due to genetic variation in metabolic rate, NEAT (fidgeting, posture maintenance, spontaneous movement), gut microbiome composition, and hormonal profiles.

Research by Donahoo et al. (2004), published in the International Journal of Obesity, demonstrated that NEAT can vary by as much as 2,000 kcal/day between individuals in a controlled environment. This means that occupation-based estimates, while useful, cannot substitute for personalized measurement.

Here is a practical framework for finding your true calorie needs regardless of profession:

Step 1: Estimate Your Starting Point

Use the Mifflin-St Jeor equation with the PAL value that best matches your occupation from the tables above. This gives you a reasonable initial estimate. For the reference male, this means a BMR of approximately 1,708 kcal. For the reference female, approximately 1,338 kcal. Multiply by your PAL to get your starting TDEE estimate.

Step 2: Track Consistently for Three Weeks

Log everything you eat with precision. Nutrola makes this efficient through photo-based meal logging and a database of over one million foods. Weigh yourself daily under consistent conditions (morning, after bathroom, before eating) and track the seven-day moving average. The moving average smooths out daily fluctuations from water retention, sodium intake, and digestive timing.

Step 3: Adjust Based on Trends

If your weight is stable, your current intake approximately equals your TDEE. If you are gaining about 0.5 kg per week, you are eating roughly 500 kcal above maintenance. If losing at that rate, you are 500 kcal below. Adjust your target accordingly. Be patient with this process, as reliable trends require at least two to three weeks of data.

Step 4: Reassess Seasonally

Your activity patterns change throughout the year. Outdoor workers experience significant seasonal variation. Even office workers tend to be more active in summer months. Reassess your TDEE estimate every 8–12 weeks or whenever your routine changes substantially. Major life changes such as switching jobs, starting a new exercise program, or recovering from injury all warrant recalculation.

Step 5: Account for Non-Work Activity

Your job is only part of the equation. Someone with a sedentary job who trains for a marathon has very different needs than a sedentary worker who goes home to the couch. Add your exercise energy expenditure on top of your occupation-based estimate, or better yet, let an adaptive tracker like Nutrola calculate it automatically from your real-world data.

Key Takeaways

The difference in daily calorie needs between the most sedentary and most active professions can exceed 4,000 calories. An office worker maintaining weight on 2,100 kcal/day and a Tour de France cyclist fueling performance on 6,000+ kcal/day exist on the same biological spectrum but occupy entirely different nutritional worlds.

Here is a summary of the calorie ranges across all five tiers:

• Sedentary professions: 2,050–2,300 kcal/day (male), 1,600–1,810 kcal/day (female)
• Light activity professions: 2,390–2,900 kcal/day (male), 1,870–2,270 kcal/day (female)
• Moderate activity professions: 2,650–3,250 kcal/day (male), 2,070–2,540 kcal/day (female)
• Heavy labor professions: 3,070–4,270 kcal/day (male), 2,410–3,340 kcal/day (female)
• Professional athletes: 3,070–5,980+ kcal/day (male), 2,410–4,680 kcal/day (female)

Understanding where your profession falls on this spectrum is valuable, but it is only an approximation. Individual variation, non-work activity, seasonal changes, and hidden metabolic factors mean that the most accurate approach combines occupation-aware estimation with consistent personal tracking. The tables and data in this article give you a strong starting point. What you do with that starting point, tracking, adjusting, and refining, determines whether it actually translates into results.

No table can replace the feedback loop of tracking your actual food intake against your actual weight trends over time. Use the profession-specific data here as your initial calibration, then let real-world data guide your ongoing adjustments.

References

• Clemes, S. A., Hamilton, S. L., & Lindley, M. R. (2014). Four-week pedometer-determined activity patterns in normal-weight and overweight UK adults. BMC Public Health, 8, 352.
• Cole, C. R., Salvaterra, G. F., Davis, J. E. (2005). Evaluation of dietary practices of National Football League players. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(5), 826-831.
• Castellani, J. W., & Young, A. J. (2016). Human physiological responses to cold exposure. Comprehensive Physiology, 6(4), 1723-1760.
• Donahoo, W. T., Levine, J. A., & Melanson, E. L. (2004). Variability in energy expenditure and its components. International Journal of Obesity, 4, 24-31.
• Dreger, R. W., Jones, R. L., & Petersen, S. R. (2006). Effects of the self-contained breathing apparatus and fire protective clothing on maximal oxygen uptake. Ergonomics, 49(10), 911-920.
• Dufour, D. L., Piperata, B. A., Murrieta, R. S. (2012). Amazonian farmers and the nutritional ecology of energy balance. American Journal of Human Biology, 24(5), 630-640.
• Dunstan, D. W., Howard, B., Healy, G. N., & Owen, N. (2012). Too much sitting: a health hazard. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 46(11), 1-3.
• Epel, E., Lapidus, R., McEwen, B., & Brownell, K. (2001). Stress may add bite to appetite in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 26(1), 37-49.
• FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. (2004). Human Energy Requirements. FAO Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series No. 1.
• Flint, E., Cummins, S., & Sacker, A. (2014). Associations between active commuting, body fat, and body mass index. British Medical Journal, 349, g4887.
• Frankenfield, D. C., Roth-Yousey, L., & Compher, C. (2005). Comparison of predictive equations for resting metabolic rate. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(5), 775-789.
• Jager, R., Kerksick, C. M., Campbell, B. I. (2017). International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: protein and exercise. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14, 20.
• Jakubowicz, D., Barnea, M., Wainstein, J., & Froy, O. (2013). High caloric intake at breakfast vs. dinner differentially influences weight loss. Obesity, 21(12), 2504-2512.
• McHill, A. W., Melanson, E. L., Higgins, J. (2014). Impact of circadian misalignment on energy metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(48), 17302-17307.
• Mifflin, M. D., St Jeor, S. T., Hill, L. A. (1990). A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51(2), 241-247.
• Ruby, B. C., Shriver, T. C., Zderic, T. W. (2002). Total energy expenditure during arduous wildfire suppression. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 34(6), 1048-1054.
• Saeidifard, F., Medina-Inojosa, J. R., Supervia, M. (2018). Differences of energy expenditure while sitting versus standing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 25(5), 522-538.
• Saris, W. H., van Erp-Baart, M. A., Brouns, F. (1989). Study on food intake and energy expenditure during extreme sustained exercise: the Tour de France. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(S1), S26-S31.
• Sun, M., Feng, W., Wang, F. (2018). Meta-analysis on shift work and risks of specific obesity types. Obesity Reviews, 19(1), 28-40.
• Tharion, W. J., Lieberman, H. R., Montain, S. J. (2005). Energy requirements of military personnel. Military Medicine, 170(S1), 60-67.
• Thomas, D. T., Erdman, K. A., Burke, L. M. (2016). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(3), 543-568.
• Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C. L., Thyfault, J. P. (2011). A step-defined sedentary lifestyle index. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8, 79.