Rump Roast vs Pot Roast: Calories and Nutrition Compared (2026)

Rump roast and pot roast have distinct nutritional profiles.

Medically reviewed by Dr. Emily Torres, Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (RDN)

Rump roast contains 26.8 g of protein and 212 calories, while pot roast has 29 g of protein and 231 calories. Pot roast is higher in protein, but also higher in calories.

Rump roast and pot roast are both popular cuts of beef, each with unique characteristics and nutritional values. Understanding their differences can help in making informed dietary choices.

What Is the Difference Between Rump Roast and Pot Roast?

Rump roast is a cut of beef from the hindquarters of the cow, known for its rich flavor and tenderness. It is often used for roasting or slow cooking. Pot roast is typically a tougher cut of beef that becomes tender when cooked slowly in liquid. It is commonly prepared in a pot with vegetables and seasonings.

Rump Roast vs Pot Roast: Nutrition Side by Side

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the nutritional content of rump roast and pot roast.

Nutrient (per 100 g) Rump roast (bottom round) Pot roast
Calories 212 kcal 231 kcal
Protein 26.8 g 29 g
Carbs 0 g 0 g
Sugar 0 g 0 g
Fat 10.8 g 11 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Sodium 35 mg 55 mg

Which Is Better, Rump Roast or Pot Roast?

For weight loss: Rump roast has 212 calories, while pot roast has 231 calories, making rump roast the better option for weight loss.

For muscle and protein: Pot roast has 29 g of protein compared to 26.8 g in rump roast, making it the better choice for muscle building.

For low-carb or low-sugar: Both rump roast and pot roast have 0 g of carbs and 0 g of sugar, making them suitable for low-carb or low-sugar diets.

How to Track Rump roast and Pot roast Accurately

Portion sizes and macro contents can often be misjudged, leading to unexpected calorie intake. Nutrola is an AI nutrition tracking app that identifies foods from a photo and returns calories and macros from a database of more than 1.8 million foods. It also supports barcode scanning and voice logging. Nutrola is available from EUR 2.50 per month and shows no ads on any tier.

How We Compiled These Numbers

The numbers provided are rounded reference values for educational use and should not be considered medical advice. Always consult a healthcare professional for personalized dietary guidance. Values are per 100 g: Rump roast from USDA FoodData Central, Pot roast from Open Food Facts (aggregated plain entries).

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Which has more protein?

Pot roast has 29 g of protein, while rump roast has 26.8 g of protein.

Which has fewer calories?

Rump roast has 212 calories, while pot roast has 231 calories.

What is the fat content in each?

Rump roast contains 10.8 g of fat, while pot roast has 11 g of fat.

How much sodium is in each roast?

Rump roast has 35 mg of sodium, while pot roast has 55 mg of sodium.

Are there any carbs in these roasts?

Both rump roast and pot roast contain 0 g of carbs.

What is the sugar content in each?

Both rump roast and pot roast have 0 g of sugar.

Key Takeaways

  • Rump roast: 212 calories per 100 g.
  • Pot roast: 231 calories per 100 g.
  • Rump roast: 26.8 g of protein.
  • Pot roast: 29 g of protein.
  • Both roasts contain 0 g of carbs and sugar.
  • Rump roast has 10.8 g of fat, pot roast has 11 g of fat.

Ready to Transform Your Nutrition Tracking?

Join millions who have transformed their health journey with Nutrola!